Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-10 12:42:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1EB88F9E86FCD7781843C33C0FE3211232CD053D3C5F064F85F2607ECF04698A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed. The other note is missing the satirical part of the Tweet and should be relegated to the comments and not a fact-checking system.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1667188175121580041
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1EB88F9E86FCD7781843C33C0FE3211232CD053D3C5F064F85F2607ECF04698A
  • createdAtMillis - 1686400929535
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16671881751215800411EB88F9E86FCD7781843C33C0FE3211232CD053D3C5F064F85F2607ECF04698A