Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-11 02:33:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F3756E8852328C1536A1138A1BDECE9B1CF648DB96D3DE211404D1E512E0BE89
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is about something the poster allegedly witnessed. There is nothing to prove that the tweet is misleading. The current note’s cited article doesn’t support statement made in the note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1667010946403844097
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F3756E8852328C1536A1138A1BDECE9B1CF648DB96D3DE211404D1E512E0BE89
  • createdAtMillis - 1686450797925
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1667010946403844097F3756E8852328C1536A1138A1BDECE9B1CF648DB96D3DE211404D1E512E0BE89