Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-10 11:17:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4E00E1FF1217B200D6A0526145923BABC5D2BB4D5CF01D1FFC7926695A777F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is about something the poster allegedly witnessed. There is nothing to prove that the tweet is misleading. The current note’s cited article doesn’t support statement made in the note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1667010946403844097
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4E00E1FF1217B200D6A0526145923BABC5D2BB4D5CF01D1FFC7926695A777F5
  • createdAtMillis - 1686395823208
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1667010946403844097C4E00E1FF1217B200D6A0526145923BABC5D2BB4D5CF01D1FFC7926695A777F5