Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-08 14:58:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 47A1477690535FF82D62D95F13D893F9F5F56494A8741CF26AB53224814DAC8C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is an opinion, and the tweet linked in the proposed note doesn’t provide any evidence as to the reason he was blocked, just a one-sided claim from a single source. Unless anyone has any proof that this feature is abuse by Ngo too, then NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1666813253236957187
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 47A1477690535FF82D62D95F13D893F9F5F56494A8741CF26AB53224814DAC8C
  • createdAtMillis - 1686236300071
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166681325323695718747A1477690535FF82D62D95F13D893F9F5F56494A8741CF26AB53224814DAC8C