Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-07 17:53:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F2882525F9C3D391184E1FA29394F21E428782BD3BFD03C63FBBDE5D03FE4EB3
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the correction about the paw print being part of the school's logo is correct, the claim there is no proof the cross was intentional is speculation. Community notes are not for speculation or opinions. I suggest a new note sticking to what is fact, the paw print.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1666492024059469824
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F2882525F9C3D391184E1FA29394F21E428782BD3BFD03C63FBBDE5D03FE4EB3
  • createdAtMillis - 1686160401363
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1666492024059469824F2882525F9C3D391184E1FA29394F21E428782BD3BFD03C63FBBDE5D03FE4EB3