Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-07 19:40:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 878C162A3D9FCB5217E6C36FBF12508500719E9BC4FCC532B02C9BE8C8C993BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the correction about the paw print being part of the school's logo is correct, the claim there is no proof the cross was intentional is speculation. Community notes are not for speculation or opinions. I suggest a new note sticking to what is fact, the paw print.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1666492024059469824
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 878C162A3D9FCB5217E6C36FBF12508500719E9BC4FCC532B02C9BE8C8C993BE
  • createdAtMillis - 1686166811185
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1666492024059469824878C162A3D9FCB5217E6C36FBF12508500719E9BC4FCC532B02C9BE8C8C993BE