Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-07 22:29:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 064B8AC75F1BBD5C6D2A80F5400CB98F0F721A3E2EDA769C9EFF41835D8AF97F
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the correction about the paw print being part of the school's logo is correct, the claim there is no proof the cross was intentional is speculation. Community notes are not for speculation or opinions. I suggest a new note sticking to what is fact, the paw print.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1666492024059469824
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 064B8AC75F1BBD5C6D2A80F5400CB98F0F721A3E2EDA769C9EFF41835D8AF97F
  • createdAtMillis - 1686176998022
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1666492024059469824064B8AC75F1BBD5C6D2A80F5400CB98F0F721A3E2EDA769C9EFF41835D8AF97F