Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-07 09:28:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 11BF2177A7903BBB530C3D0A73BF72DB6CAC31944CCA4C03596B32106411FE0F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article includes a link to the court filing including the names of the twitter lawyers serving as the basis for this article. NNN https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cand.387133/gov.uscourts.cand.387133.195.0.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1666292708745330690
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 11BF2177A7903BBB530C3D0A73BF72DB6CAC31944CCA4C03596B32106411FE0F
  • createdAtMillis - 1686130108560
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166629270874533069011BF2177A7903BBB530C3D0A73BF72DB6CAC31944CCA4C03596B32106411FE0F