Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-06 17:32:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CB94E7ADBEC04BDB89E3DA18C18DC32EC7E7953A591CA15711AB14323F16642C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, Tweet doesn’t address legitimacy of buy backs or constitutionality of the ownership of firearms under the 2nd amendment. Tweet instead claims of protesting, which is anecdotal, and the rest of the tweet only states opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1666122794311225344
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CB94E7ADBEC04BDB89E3DA18C18DC32EC7E7953A591CA15711AB14323F16642C
  • createdAtMillis - 1686072760581
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1666122794311225344CB94E7ADBEC04BDB89E3DA18C18DC32EC7E7953A591CA15711AB14323F16642C