Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-06 21:07:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5453502F6A093267FD13A18BF811EFBE1470FC381D4D9F1366319EA8CAD38E63
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, Tweet doesn’t address legitimacy of buy backs or constitutionality of the ownership of firearms under the 2nd amendment. Tweet instead claims of protesting, which is anecdotal, and the rest of the tweet only states opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1666122794311225344
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5453502F6A093267FD13A18BF811EFBE1470FC381D4D9F1366319EA8CAD38E63
  • createdAtMillis - 1686085660445
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16661227943112253445453502F6A093267FD13A18BF811EFBE1470FC381D4D9F1366319EA8CAD38E63