Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-06 19:04:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3E8409710391E5AF9D4765FB49995766E8A5A9027CA8AB84E1892E610C4A5976
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, Tweet doesn’t address legitimacy of buy backs or constitutionality of the ownership of firearms under the 2nd amendment. Tweet instead claims of protesting, which is anecdotal, and the rest of the tweet only states opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1666122794311225344
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3E8409710391E5AF9D4765FB49995766E8A5A9027CA8AB84E1892E610C4A5976
  • createdAtMillis - 1686078280980
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16661227943112253443E8409710391E5AF9D4765FB49995766E8A5A9027CA8AB84E1892E610C4A5976