Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-02 11:38:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FF4A37D3F56045E2CC5C7813F2D5A90B3E2F677F1602C7840D5166174D487C6F
Participant Details

Original Note:

As of now we don't know the details. Everybody jumping up here to correct the story, while it remains UNCLEAR from the sum of public information what actually happened, shows what is wrong with Notes: partisans eager to use it to spin potentially influential reports.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1664573565444972544
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FF4A37D3F56045E2CC5C7813F2D5A90B3E2F677F1602C7840D5166174D487C6F
  • createdAtMillis - 1685705924574
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1664573565444972544FF4A37D3F56045E2CC5C7813F2D5A90B3E2F677F1602C7840D5166174D487C6F