Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-02 10:24:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D806797FE26701EF1ACF6AF025323B2E90B458331C2D2113FDE12719E88C24F1
Participant Details

Original Note:

As of now we don't know the details. Everybody jumping up here to correct the story, while it remains UNCLEAR from the sum of public information what actually happened, shows what is wrong with Notes: partisans eager to use it to spin potentially influential reports.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1664573565444972544
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D806797FE26701EF1ACF6AF025323B2E90B458331C2D2113FDE12719E88C24F1
  • createdAtMillis - 1685701440583
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1664573565444972544D806797FE26701EF1ACF6AF025323B2E90B458331C2D2113FDE12719E88C24F1