Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-02 10:43:25 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 25F8B0A5397F62FE52C42DD79AA6FED680046287E1171D1E9F05C7CA10DC70C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

As of now we don't know the details. Everybody jumping up here to correct the story, while it remains UNCLEAR from the sum of public information what actually happened, shows what is wrong with Notes: partisans eager to use it to spin potentially influential reports.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1664573565444972544
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 25F8B0A5397F62FE52C42DD79AA6FED680046287E1171D1E9F05C7CA10DC70C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1685702605053
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166457356544497254425F8B0A5397F62FE52C42DD79AA6FED680046287E1171D1E9F05C7CA10DC70C1