Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-02 10:07:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0632CFE89C2082A69E73D9540F275A2656CCEB1718D5B260665529D1BA73FDE7
Participant Details

Original Note:

As of now we don't know the details. Everybody jumping up here to correct the story, while it remains UNCLEAR from the sum of public information what actually happened, shows what is wrong with Notes: partisans eager to use it to spin potentially influential reports.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1664573565444972544
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0632CFE89C2082A69E73D9540F275A2656CCEB1718D5B260665529D1BA73FDE7
  • createdAtMillis - 1685700477566
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16645735654449725440632CFE89C2082A69E73D9540F275A2656CCEB1718D5B260665529D1BA73FDE7