Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-13 07:15:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04E4E65352FE5F8EA473C7F80CA01128388872B7F7394F5C3A80DF16BF73031A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The first sentence says it's trying for a fact check. In that context, the second sentence is clearly false, even without a note. Also, the replies all take the tweet as a joke. No replies take it seriously. https://twitter.com/prezoh/status/1664364683590000641 Since the joke is already clear, additional context isn't helpful. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/notes-on-twitter

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1664569754458419201
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 04E4E65352FE5F8EA473C7F80CA01128388872B7F7394F5C3A80DF16BF73031A
  • createdAtMillis - 1686640520979
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166456975445841920104E4E65352FE5F8EA473C7F80CA01128388872B7F7394F5C3A80DF16BF73031A