Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-01 03:21:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AF28051F159F01020D567C402C0F739AC574944B2E86BBBF02284B29E04D0C48
Participant Details

Original Note:

Trump could not have fired Fauci directly but could have through proper channels. Trump also could have sidelined Fauci, removed him from any influential role, and could have denied his advice/input effectively making Fauci irrelevant. This is all a matter of perspective. https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/longevity/507297-can-trump-fire-fauci-expert-weighs-in/amp/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1664032135882186752
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AF28051F159F01020D567C402C0F739AC574944B2E86BBBF02284B29E04D0C48
  • createdAtMillis - 1685589684947
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1664032135882186752AF28051F159F01020D567C402C0F739AC574944B2E86BBBF02284B29E04D0C48