Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-31 22:57:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6DD62212B01DF312B800E4630181D7FD90E29515B84D8D6EAC4F74D51B3B8ACF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Trump could not have fired Fauci directly but could have through proper channels. Trump also could have sidelined Fauci, removed him from any influential role, and could have denied his advice/input effectively making Fauci irrelevant. This is all a matter of perspective. https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/longevity/507297-can-trump-fire-fauci-expert-weighs-in/amp/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1664032135882186752
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 6DD62212B01DF312B800E4630181D7FD90E29515B84D8D6EAC4F74D51B3B8ACF
createdAtMillis - 1685573865095
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16640321358821867526DD62212B01DF312B800E4630181D7FD90E29515B84D8D6EAC4F74D51B3B8ACF