Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-01 17:32:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1D43FF4F1F494F21DE80B535A3D86233B62CDE46DBB924B27CED2DA9180E8A10
Participant Details

Original Note:

Trump could not have fired Fauci directly but could have through proper channels. Trump also could have sidelined Fauci, removed him from any influential role, and could have denied his advice/input effectively making Fauci irrelevant. This is all a matter of perspective. https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/longevity/507297-can-trump-fire-fauci-expert-weighs-in/amp/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1664032135882186752
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1D43FF4F1F494F21DE80B535A3D86233B62CDE46DBB924B27CED2DA9180E8A10
  • createdAtMillis - 1685640723037
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16640321358821867521D43FF4F1F494F21DE80B535A3D86233B62CDE46DBB924B27CED2DA9180E8A10