Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-01 15:54:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1CED67DA2B68AD572579397A76E633A3ED65EB3FEA93B7FF7A1A8F59E015D80E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Trump could not have fired Fauci directly but could have through proper channels. Trump also could have sidelined Fauci, removed him from any influential role, and could have denied his advice/input effectively making Fauci irrelevant. This is all a matter of perspective. https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/longevity/507297-can-trump-fire-fauci-expert-weighs-in/amp/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1664032135882186752
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1CED67DA2B68AD572579397A76E633A3ED65EB3FEA93B7FF7A1A8F59E015D80E
  • createdAtMillis - 1685634879915
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16640321358821867521CED67DA2B68AD572579397A76E633A3ED65EB3FEA93B7FF7A1A8F59E015D80E