Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-01 17:51:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0AC3E7FBB4054898DCA94710A46DA3078879558507E1748C63854C91F7A43A05
Participant Details

Original Note:

Trump could not have fired Fauci directly but could have through proper channels. Trump also could have sidelined Fauci, removed him from any influential role, and could have denied his advice/input effectively making Fauci irrelevant. This is all a matter of perspective. https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/longevity/507297-can-trump-fire-fauci-expert-weighs-in/amp/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1664032135882186752
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0AC3E7FBB4054898DCA94710A46DA3078879558507E1748C63854C91F7A43A05
createdAtMillis - 1685641900339
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16640321358821867520AC3E7FBB4054898DCA94710A46DA3078879558507E1748C63854C91F7A43A05