Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-01 01:34:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EB5673BD1510BC4A5774CBA7309F48B7127FE610CB3AF35C7FBC203B7FB948E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet accurately describes the findings of the research detailed in the article. The research was straightforward within its scope. Discussion of its scope and methods can go in replies/comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1664017923566891016
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EB5673BD1510BC4A5774CBA7309F48B7127FE610CB3AF35C7FBC203B7FB948E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1685583288053
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1664017923566891016EB5673BD1510BC4A5774CBA7309F48B7127FE610CB3AF35C7FBC203B7FB948E4