Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-01 02:44:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E98069A16CFE85ADB0A6E6167B028DF1C2CEDCFBB7FCB26A05A43EF4B5FABC9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet accurately describes the findings of the research detailed in the article. The research was straightforward within its scope. Discussion of its scope and methods can go in replies/comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1664017923566891016
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E98069A16CFE85ADB0A6E6167B028DF1C2CEDCFBB7FCB26A05A43EF4B5FABC9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1685587447683
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1664017923566891016E98069A16CFE85ADB0A6E6167B028DF1C2CEDCFBB7FCB26A05A43EF4B5FABC9A