Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-01 00:37:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 58E3740EDF5851564B8D244C6A2B682B78212A8B056EA0E6A615114F29EA725D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet accurately describes the findings of the research detailed in the article. The research was straightforward within its scope. Discussion of its scope and methods can go in replies/comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1664017923566891016
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 58E3740EDF5851564B8D244C6A2B682B78212A8B056EA0E6A615114F29EA725D
  • createdAtMillis - 1685579851186
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166401792356689101658E3740EDF5851564B8D244C6A2B682B78212A8B056EA0E6A615114F29EA725D