Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-31 22:41:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C84CE77366A159BFF447C7C68E00585FB4E0638E13FBDC291BBCBFC6D0E974C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet accurately describes the findings of the research detailed in the article. The research was straightforward within its scope. Discussion of its scope and methods can go in replies/comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1664017923566891016
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C84CE77366A159BFF447C7C68E00585FB4E0638E13FBDC291BBCBFC6D0E974C
  • createdAtMillis - 1685572873571
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16640179235668910163C84CE77366A159BFF447C7C68E00585FB4E0638E13FBDC291BBCBFC6D0E974C