Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-31 23:49:02 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BFDD11545C60450F6D693A59EAD5462278E3ECB2681E7222E22903FD7BE97E66
Participant Details

Original Note:

最高裁が高裁判決を破棄して高裁へ差し戻したのであって、無罪が確定したわけではない。 https://sp.m3.com/news/open/iryoishin/1016654 また、息子が飛び込んだ理由は明らかになっておらず、その事件と結びつけるのは安易な憶測で不適切。 それを根拠として女性へのAEDの利用がリスクが高いかのような印象を植え付けるのは不適切。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1663963739232813056
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BFDD11545C60450F6D693A59EAD5462278E3ECB2681E7222E22903FD7BE97E66
  • createdAtMillis - 1685576942342
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1663963739232813056BFDD11545C60450F6D693A59EAD5462278E3ECB2681E7222E22903FD7BE97E66