Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-18 08:23:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8810A325B44D4293F00D4F69500FA204B4EFB4A54C51C12D27C4DA5A0730D6DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

最高裁が高裁判決を破棄して高裁へ差し戻したのであって、無罪が確定したわけではない。 https://sp.m3.com/news/open/iryoishin/1016654 また、息子が飛び込んだ理由は明らかになっておらず、その事件と結びつけるのは安易な憶測で不適切。 それを根拠として女性へのAEDの利用がリスクが高いかのような印象を植え付けるのは不適切。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1663963739232813056
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8810A325B44D4293F00D4F69500FA204B4EFB4A54C51C12D27C4DA5A0730D6DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1689668584078
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16639637392328130568810A325B44D4293F00D4F69500FA204B4EFB4A54C51C12D27C4DA5A0730D6DD