Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-30 17:26:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E22ACFA7F5E65A85B8F927A2471ADE5FBA44DCE6A4D25C9B4DEF8F199AD4FEE2
Participant Details

Original Note:

A nota da comunidade não identificou a postagem do autor como falsa, apenas trouxe contexto aos leitores que poderiam ter entendido que o PL faria essa regulação, esclarecendo que isso é falso. Link da nota: https://twitter.com/i/birdwatch/n/1661517266054160385 Ademais, o Twitter já tem um canal para usuários recorrerem: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/pt/contributing/additional-review

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1663592041010298894
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E22ACFA7F5E65A85B8F927A2471ADE5FBA44DCE6A4D25C9B4DEF8F199AD4FEE2
  • createdAtMillis - 1685467571926
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1663592041010298894E22ACFA7F5E65A85B8F927A2471ADE5FBA44DCE6A4D25C9B4DEF8F199AD4FEE2