Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-31 08:43:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BB366B1049029E586CE92E2020241CBD72CBFDB682FAC96C17286EF38BCDF6E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The quoted study includes corrections based on reviewer comments that their research is a hypothesis that needs to be tested. This, and other corrections are documented in the Review Report. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/11/5/991/review_report

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1663430176544555009
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BB366B1049029E586CE92E2020241CBD72CBFDB682FAC96C17286EF38BCDF6E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1685522594610
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1663430176544555009BB366B1049029E586CE92E2020241CBD72CBFDB682FAC96C17286EF38BCDF6E4