Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-29 22:15:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED7E018D7B680F23A0CB90467AFD393AAFC99B4D0CEC1D2F483D4B0D7C52C73C
Participant Details

Original Note:

There’s no justification for a note without solid proof that it isn’t him, the current proposed note is speculating and belongs in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1663075683441025025
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ED7E018D7B680F23A0CB90467AFD393AAFC99B4D0CEC1D2F483D4B0D7C52C73C
  • createdAtMillis - 1685398538631
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1663075683441025025ED7E018D7B680F23A0CB90467AFD393AAFC99B4D0CEC1D2F483D4B0D7C52C73C