Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-29 14:31:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BCF92F1B079341D9F57694D4D3B2E84BAC33D7B3FDF52324229C7A8000DEE18B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study was published in the well-respected JIW after going through peer review. Study was reviewed by SMEs of various political backgrounds for methodology, findings, and overall accuracy. Study passed peer review because it meets the rigorous standards required of academia.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662996438169665536
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BCF92F1B079341D9F57694D4D3B2E84BAC33D7B3FDF52324229C7A8000DEE18B
  • createdAtMillis - 1685370675151
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1662996438169665536BCF92F1B079341D9F57694D4D3B2E84BAC33D7B3FDF52324229C7A8000DEE18B