Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-30 02:03:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8B304C6001B4C81A5AE136053ABAD113D402A79267A355979B13D01E0E1D0BB5
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study was published in the well-respected JIW after going through peer review. Study was reviewed by SMEs of various political backgrounds for methodology, findings, and overall accuracy. Study passed peer review because it meets the rigorous standards required of academia.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662996438169665536
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8B304C6001B4C81A5AE136053ABAD113D402A79267A355979B13D01E0E1D0BB5
  • createdAtMillis - 1685412193774
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16629964381696655368B304C6001B4C81A5AE136053ABAD113D402A79267A355979B13D01E0E1D0BB5