Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-30 20:30:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39CBE6340AA8E58AAEC3916684D400BE831B8106D0E9FF404FD44B2045B31468
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study was published in the well-respected JIW after going through peer review. Study was reviewed by SMEs of various political backgrounds for methodology, findings, and overall accuracy. Study passed peer review because it meets the rigorous standards required of academia.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662996438169665536
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39CBE6340AA8E58AAEC3916684D400BE831B8106D0E9FF404FD44B2045B31468
  • createdAtMillis - 1685478626873
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166299643816966553639CBE6340AA8E58AAEC3916684D400BE831B8106D0E9FF404FD44B2045B31468