Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-29 22:45:02 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3323218A12216463B4E22FBF9AE26E792419B929B0D7BBBA2377F8F03EE53B36
Participant Details

Original Note:

This study was published in the well-respected JIW after going through peer review. Study was reviewed by SMEs of various political backgrounds for methodology, findings, and overall accuracy. Study passed peer review because it meets the rigorous standards required of academia.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662996438169665536
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3323218A12216463B4E22FBF9AE26E792419B929B0D7BBBA2377F8F03EE53B36
  • createdAtMillis - 1685400302918
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16629964381696655363323218A12216463B4E22FBF9AE26E792419B929B0D7BBBA2377F8F03EE53B36