Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-28 20:16:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C6CD191EF195A422471A4F1CDA2D26AAF596E706AA14F84F758BEC40174D28AD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed: because it is factually correct that AT THE TIME, it was the highest number of votes received by an independent candidate So the tweet is presented in a “historical context” Note does nothing to improve the tweet, or the story as nothing is misleading https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1912_United_States_presidential_election

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662906680722505728
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C6CD191EF195A422471A4F1CDA2D26AAF596E706AA14F84F758BEC40174D28AD
  • createdAtMillis - 1685304988379
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1662906680722505728C6CD191EF195A422471A4F1CDA2D26AAF596E706AA14F84F758BEC40174D28AD