Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-28 23:59:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BD576AE7E6B6BD3E594D488789551F0EAB9C5BA44A604A59B3F77EF980F5DEB5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed: because it is factually correct that AT THE TIME, it was the highest number of votes received by an independent candidate So the tweet is presented in a “historical context” Note does nothing to improve the tweet, or the story as nothing is misleading https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1912_United_States_presidential_election

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662906680722505728
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BD576AE7E6B6BD3E594D488789551F0EAB9C5BA44A604A59B3F77EF980F5DEB5
  • createdAtMillis - 1685318397551
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1662906680722505728BD576AE7E6B6BD3E594D488789551F0EAB9C5BA44A604A59B3F77EF980F5DEB5