Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-29 00:20:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B25DAD9510BF9DD2A5B2C528501B85CDE72883E52B98D12B7C8C8742BC665878
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note not needed: because it is factually correct that AT THE TIME, it was the highest number of votes received by an independent candidate So the tweet is presented in a “historical context” Note does nothing to improve the tweet, or the story as nothing is misleading https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1912_United_States_presidential_election

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662906680722505728
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B25DAD9510BF9DD2A5B2C528501B85CDE72883E52B98D12B7C8C8742BC665878
  • createdAtMillis - 1685319625395
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1662906680722505728B25DAD9510BF9DD2A5B2C528501B85CDE72883E52B98D12B7C8C8742BC665878