Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-28 11:46:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FCBF693EE7F0717AECAB175FA53DA0076949BC57E530CAF23E403753D504D55F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is incorrect to say that 5 justices “gutted” the EPA’s ability to set clean water standards. Although the justices differed on the exact approach (as often occurs), the Court’s actual decision in the case was unanimous: 9-0. All 9 justices agreed on the outcome. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-454_4g15.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662774352184586246
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FCBF693EE7F0717AECAB175FA53DA0076949BC57E530CAF23E403753D504D55F
  • createdAtMillis - 1685274411619
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1662774352184586246FCBF693EE7F0717AECAB175FA53DA0076949BC57E530CAF23E403753D504D55F