Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-28 17:22:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0DF8E53EA66FD25EBF8AFA180BE3D87891D0FAE1E31182C14E56B875F37E8B9C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is incorrect to say that 5 justices “gutted” the EPA’s ability to set clean water standards. Although the justices differed on the exact approach (as often occurs), the Court’s actual decision in the case was unanimous: 9-0. All 9 justices agreed on the outcome. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-454_4g15.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662774352184586246
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0DF8E53EA66FD25EBF8AFA180BE3D87891D0FAE1E31182C14E56B875F37E8B9C
  • createdAtMillis - 1685294538297
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16627743521845862460DF8E53EA66FD25EBF8AFA180BE3D87891D0FAE1E31182C14E56B875F37E8B9C