Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-28 10:10:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9ECCE2BA5BCBD92F5E778079A01E1260EEE2E55ABF5F0390FD04D4F36BC9A26A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The motion referred to was a motion to gag debate and proceed immediately to a vote on a piece of legislation that is still under negotiation in the Senate. https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/senators-demand-names-in-pwc-leaks-scandal-20230510-p5d75i?post=p54tu7 Said legislation has been criticised widely as a grossly insufficient gamble on the stock market. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/mar/22/what-is-labors-10bn-social-housing-fund-and-will-it-be-torn-down-by-parliament

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662751275975577600
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9ECCE2BA5BCBD92F5E778079A01E1260EEE2E55ABF5F0390FD04D4F36BC9A26A
  • createdAtMillis - 1685268635132
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16627512759755776009ECCE2BA5BCBD92F5E778079A01E1260EEE2E55ABF5F0390FD04D4F36BC9A26A