Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-29 04:41:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A8C3E6C053F0B877387E48A97183450BF2407DDDC8FF92DA8F8AD3AC7AED3825
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet clearly does not contain a specific claim; at worst it’s arguably a pretty heavy-handed insinuation, but that makes it an expression of opinion, not an assertion of fact. The context in the two notes is probably accurate, but that’s immaterial because no note is needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662725383806935042
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A8C3E6C053F0B877387E48A97183450BF2407DDDC8FF92DA8F8AD3AC7AED3825
  • createdAtMillis - 1685335262785
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1662725383806935042A8C3E6C053F0B877387E48A97183450BF2407DDDC8FF92DA8F8AD3AC7AED3825