Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-29 01:37:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 160F50C683B8EE1A5588C588B8949DD8C5CCB8EA2BCBB46F05E3D60E468476B6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet clearly does not contain a specific claim; at worst it’s arguably a pretty heavy-handed insinuation, but that makes it an expression of opinion, not an assertion of fact. The context in the two notes is probably accurate, but that’s immaterial because no note is needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662725383806935042
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 160F50C683B8EE1A5588C588B8949DD8C5CCB8EA2BCBB46F05E3D60E468476B6
  • createdAtMillis - 1685324247856
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1662725383806935042160F50C683B8EE1A5588C588B8949DD8C5CCB8EA2BCBB46F05E3D60E468476B6