Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-01 20:19:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 122C6C806ED729C78DFA46C64D97D60D960234D6A6BDC2B765297CB570EF0E19
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet clearly does not contain a specific claim; at worst it’s arguably a pretty heavy-handed insinuation, but that makes it an expression of opinion, not an assertion of fact. The context in the two notes is probably accurate, but that’s immaterial because no note is needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662725383806935042
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 122C6C806ED729C78DFA46C64D97D60D960234D6A6BDC2B765297CB570EF0E19
  • createdAtMillis - 1685650771787
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1662725383806935042122C6C806ED729C78DFA46C64D97D60D960234D6A6BDC2B765297CB570EF0E19