Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-28 08:33:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1165E2C5E9CFB5915A2155DD41C0F841022D15CE41E2E2CBBD329461D5892D3D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet clearly does not contain a specific claim; at worst it’s arguably a pretty heavy-handed insinuation, but that makes it an expression of opinion, not an assertion of fact. The context in the two notes is probably accurate, but that’s immaterial because no note is needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662725383806935042
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1165E2C5E9CFB5915A2155DD41C0F841022D15CE41E2E2CBBD329461D5892D3D
  • createdAtMillis - 1685262827770
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16627253838069350421165E2C5E9CFB5915A2155DD41C0F841022D15CE41E2E2CBBD329461D5892D3D