Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-28 17:21:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0C0277523B8F0273BFFAD1086AFE2B767804B1A6C9E3A99F68DE7BE1A232A4A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is an undisputed account of events and her opinion of what they amount to. It’s clear that the author isn’t alleging that Rittenhouse has been convicted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662575527759060992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E0C0277523B8F0273BFFAD1086AFE2B767804B1A6C9E3A99F68DE7BE1A232A4A
  • createdAtMillis - 1685294479272
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1662575527759060992E0C0277523B8F0273BFFAD1086AFE2B767804B1A6C9E3A99F68DE7BE1A232A4A