Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-29 00:33:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD6F7FBC7CA63E7E4DD215B0BDBCEB9D65C9322359FA0833AD36E9A92073D240
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is an undisputed account of events and her opinion of what they amount to. It’s clear that the author isn’t alleging that Rittenhouse has been convicted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662575527759060992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DD6F7FBC7CA63E7E4DD215B0BDBCEB9D65C9322359FA0833AD36E9A92073D240
  • createdAtMillis - 1685320421249
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1662575527759060992DD6F7FBC7CA63E7E4DD215B0BDBCEB9D65C9322359FA0833AD36E9A92073D240