Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-28 01:56:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B9847A6A4F66C5FF8A0ABC4122E5B9D27C7E393CFA3E607DE7EAB1794CE3E9E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is an undisputed account of events and her opinion of what they amount to. It’s clear that the author isn’t alleging that Rittenhouse has been convicted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662575527759060992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B9847A6A4F66C5FF8A0ABC4122E5B9D27C7E393CFA3E607DE7EAB1794CE3E9E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1685238987181
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1662575527759060992B9847A6A4F66C5FF8A0ABC4122E5B9D27C7E393CFA3E607DE7EAB1794CE3E9E5