Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-28 15:45:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C590910A1AC27671F66772B3B2AD88FCD06B1F3A3EEF05B98D3981D618D9B72
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is an undisputed account of events and her opinion of what they amount to. It’s clear that the author isn’t alleging that Rittenhouse has been convicted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662575527759060992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C590910A1AC27671F66772B3B2AD88FCD06B1F3A3EEF05B98D3981D618D9B72
  • createdAtMillis - 1685288718352
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16625755277590609924C590910A1AC27671F66772B3B2AD88FCD06B1F3A3EEF05B98D3981D618D9B72