Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-28 05:04:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 264D5BEED91F6A8B5B907A23EF3B5B4AC487CA5A01E91C45E56C05B2DBE49865
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is an undisputed account of events and her opinion of what they amount to. It’s clear that the author isn’t alleging that Rittenhouse has been convicted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662575527759060992
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 264D5BEED91F6A8B5B907A23EF3B5B4AC487CA5A01E91C45E56C05B2DBE49865
  • createdAtMillis - 1685250258135
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1662575527759060992264D5BEED91F6A8B5B907A23EF3B5B4AC487CA5A01E91C45E56C05B2DBE49865