Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-27 14:08:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BEAA5E609AEDC7ED95CB7E61B21D6B80EA68E708244BF0B4EB14E38C22C1573A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The NYT article mentions several times that the EPA overstepped its reach in this case. This was unanimous. “On Thursday, all nine justices agreed that the agency had gone too far in seeking to regulate the Sacketts’ property.“ Also, the case was not about a big polluter. https://t.co/1ND7Jie8q2

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1662318226100097024
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BEAA5E609AEDC7ED95CB7E61B21D6B80EA68E708244BF0B4EB14E38C22C1573A
  • createdAtMillis - 1685196525496
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1662318226100097024BEAA5E609AEDC7ED95CB7E61B21D6B80EA68E708244BF0B4EB14E38C22C1573A